Add T'Chaka, Venerable King - #6946
Conversation
|
Note Reviews pausedIt looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the Use the following commands to manage reviews:
Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe PR adds ChangesCommander-control restriction support
Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~25 minutes Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant OracleConditionParser
participant ParsedCondition
participant RestrictionEvaluator
participant CommanderControlHelpers
OracleConditionParser->>ParsedCondition: create ControlsCommander with ownership
ParsedCondition->>RestrictionEvaluator: evaluate commander condition
RestrictionEvaluator->>CommanderControlHelpers: check commander control
CommanderControlHelpers-->>RestrictionEvaluator: return result
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
|
Generated for head Parse changes introduced by this PR · 1 card(s), 1 signature(s) (baseline: main
|
matthewevans
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Blocking changes requested for reviewed head f3a8e1e73fd78f7af06afb8020ae62bca24be1aa.
-
This T’Chaka PR contains the unresolved Lady Loki implementation: commit
269497e4f41257e72d74169f9049c9451335191eis its ancestor, and open #6945 remainsCHANGES_REQUESTED. The current-head parse artifact also reports unclaimed Lady Loki and O-Kagachi changes: #6946 (comment). Please provide a clean split: remove the inherited #6945 work, or wait until independently fixed #6945 is merged and rebase onto that result. Then regenerate the parse-diff evidence bound to the new head. -
The new
ParsedCondition::ControlsCommander { ownership: Any }runtime path is not covered by the added production test: T’Chaka exercises only the owner-scopedOwnactivation branch. Add a production cast/activation regression for generic “you control a commander” (for example Deadly Rollick/Deflecting Swat), including the positive stolen-commander case, so the newAnyevaluator is exercised rather than only parser shape/snapshots.
|
@matthewevans thanks — replying to both points. 1. Inherited #6945 work / parse blast radius. I've pushed the same type-qualifier narrowing here ( That makes the parse-diff honest, but it does not on its own give you the clean split you asked for — this branch still carries the Lady Loki implementation. Plan: land the now-fixed #6945 first, then rebase this PR onto main so the inherited work drops out, and regenerate the parse-diff evidence bound to the new head. If you'd rather I strip the inherited commits and re-scope this PR to T'Chaka-only right now instead of waiting on #6945, say the word and I'll do that. 2. |
matthewevans
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Blocking changes requested for current head 014011cc7733c7e511ee722212368299164f9eb7.
-
[HIGH] Clean split remains absent. Commit
269497e4f41257e72d74169f9049c9451335191eremains an ancestor of this head, while open #6945 is stillCHANGES_REQUESTED. The PR therefore carries independently unresolved Lady Loki work alongside T’Chaka. Please remove that inherited work, or wait for a fixed #6945 to merge and rebase, then publish a fresh, narrowly scoped parse diff. -
[HIGH]
ControlsCommander { ownership: Any }still lacks runtime coverage.crates/engine/src/game/restrictions.rshas the newAnyevaluator, butcrates/engine/tests/integration/tchaka_venerable_king.rscovers only owner-scopedOwn. Add a production cast/activation regression for generic “you control a commander” (for example Deadly Rollick or Deflecting Swat), including the positive stolen-commander case. -
[HIGH] Current-head parser evidence is missing. The only parse-diff artifact linked from this PR is bound to prior head
f3a8e1e73fd78f7af06afb8020ae62bca24be1aa(artifact); the current head changedcrates/engine/src/parser/oracle_nom/quantity.rs. Regenerate the artifact against the clean, updated head so the parser change can be reviewed.
matthewevans
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Blocking changes requested for current head 04417fa9f0d757c8fa3bc9c51b83a6c8697d4ca3.
-
[HIGH] This is still not a clean T’Chaka PR. Commit
269497e4f41257e72d74169f9049c9451335191e(Lady Loki) remains an ancestor, and open #6945 remainsCHANGES_REQUESTED. The current parse artifact is valid and bound to this head, but it confirms the scope problem: it reports both Lady Loki and T’Chaka changes (artifact). Please remove the inherited #6945 work, or rebase after a fixed #6945 has merged, then publish the clean current-head artifact. The artifact is not stale; it is evidence of the remaining contamination. -
[HIGH] The new restriction-layer
CommanderOwnership::Anypath is still unproven by a production runtime test.crates/engine/src/game/restrictions.rs:1643-1645introduces the evaluator, whilecrates/engine/tests/integration/tchaka_venerable_king.rs:125-180exercises only owner-scopedOwnand intentionally rejects a stolen commander. Add a real parsed/cast pipeline regression for Deadly Rollick or Deflecting Swat with P0 controlling a stolen P1 commander and no own commander; assert the free-cast branch is offered and can be used, while preserving a no-commander negative. -
[HIGH] Required CI is red because this PR moved a line-pinned production census without refreshing it.
crates/engine/src/game/engine.rs:15209-15211still expectsgame/effects/mod.rs:5996,6073, and9048; the current merge-tree test sees5999,6076, and9051. The PR’scrates/engine/src/game/effects/mod.rs:2523-2526formatting/visibility change shifts those downstream coordinates by three lines. Rebuild/read the CI merge tree as the census guidance requires (engine.rs:15198-15208), verify the producer bodies are unchanged, then update the documented drift/pins from that evidence and rerun CI.
04417fa to
24b7830
Compare
matthewevans
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Current head 24b7830351dc34a9acea836a8b54f8723d2dacf1 needs one production-pipeline discriminator before approval.
[MED] The any-owner Deadly Rollick test stops at legal-action enumeration. Evidence: crates/engine/tests/integration/tchaka_venerable_king.rs:265-274 defines cast_offered solely as a legal_actions probe, and the stolen-commander (CommanderOwnership::Any) case at :293-301 only asserts that a cast action is offered. Why it matters: this does not exercise selecting the free Alternative, selecting a Bystander target, or resolving the spell; a later alternative-cost/target/resolve-path regression could leave the test green while the advertised card behavior fails. Suggested fix: add a scenario that controls the opponent-owned commander, selects Deadly Rollick's Alternative cast decision, targets a Bystander, resolves it, and asserts that Bystander is exiled.
matthewevans
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Current head 5c5d4af618a99089881908ee364c50be80d97af9 remains blocked on two current-head gates.
[HIGH] The parser coverage artifact is stale. Evidence: this PR changes parser files, but the sole <!-- coverage-parse-diff --> comment is generated for 24b7830351dc34a9acea836a8b54f8723d2dacf1, not this head. Why it matters: the current card-level parser blast radius has not been verified. Suggested fix: let current-head CI publish a parse-diff artifact bound to 5c5d4af618a99089881908ee364c50be80d97af9, then review its complete card/signature delta.
[MED] The CommanderOwnership::Any test still stops at legal-action enumeration. Evidence: crates/engine/tests/integration/tchaka_venerable_king.rs:265-274 defines cast_offered as a legal_actions probe, and its stolen-commander case at :293-301 only asserts that a cast action exists. Why it matters: it never verifies selection of the free Alternative, Bystander targeting, or actual Deadly Rollick resolution. Suggested fix: retain the no-commander negative and add a production scenario that controls the opponent-owned commander, selects the Alternative, targets Bystander, resolves, and asserts Bystander is exiled.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@crates/engine/tests/integration/tchaka_venerable_king.rs`:
- Around line 89-93: Update the CommanderSetup::OwnInCommandZone branch to
return the command-zone object ID instead of None, then add a precondition
before probing legality that verifies the object is in Zone::CommandZone and has
is_commander set to true. Preserve the existing with_commander flow while
ensuring the test fails if either staged-state assumption is not met.
- Around line 28-30: Update the rules citations in the test documentation
comments to use CR 701.13 instead of CR 701.17c and CR 701.17a, while leaving
the existing CR 725.1 monarch citation unchanged.
- Around line 400-419: Add post-decline assertions immediately after the empty
SelectCards action to verify resolution completed: assert the stack is empty,
WaitingFor is no longer EffectZoneChoice, and T’Chaka is on the battlefield,
using the harness’s actual field and accessor names. Keep the existing graveyard
and hand assertions afterward so they validate the settled post-resolution
state.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: fae93735-9e84-44c0-a978-9b38089b6b51
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
crates/engine/src/parser/oracle_ir/snapshots/engine__parser__oracle_ir__snapshot_tests__deadly_rollick_ir.snapis excluded by!**/*.snap,!**/snapshots/**crates/engine/src/parser/oracle_ir/snapshots/engine__parser__oracle_ir__snapshot_tests__deadly_rollick_lowered.snapis excluded by!**/*.snap,!**/snapshots/**
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
crates/engine/src/ai_support/filter.rscrates/engine/src/game/restrictions.rscrates/engine/src/parser/oracle_condition.rscrates/engine/src/types/ability.rscrates/engine/tests/integration/main.rscrates/engine/tests/integration/tchaka_venerable_king.rs
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- crates/engine/src/game/restrictions.rs
- crates/engine/src/parser/oracle_condition.rs
- crates/engine/src/ai_support/filter.rs
- crates/engine/src/types/ability.rs
- crates/engine/tests/integration/main.rs
| //! 2. The ETB "mill three, then you may put an artifact or land card from among | ||
| //! the milled cards into your hand" (CR 701.17c) — a regression guard on the | ||
| //! already-correct tracked-set pipeline. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
🧩 Analysis chain
🌐 Web query:
Magic Comprehensive Rules mill keyword action rule number 701, monarch designation rule number
💡 Result:
In the current Magic: The Gathering Comprehensive Rules (as of April 17, 2026), the rules are organized as follows: The keyword action "mill" is defined under rule 701.13 [1][2]. The rules regarding "The Monarch" designation are located in section 725 [1][2]. Note: The rule numbers for these sections may change over time as new mechanics and rule sections are added to the Comprehensive Rules [3][4][5][6][7][8]. As of the April 17, 2026 update, section 725 covers the monarch [1][2].
Citations:
- 1: https://media.wizards.com/2026/downloads/MagicCompRules%2020260417.txt
- 2: https://media.wizards.com/2026/downloads/MagicCompRules%2020260417.pdf
- 3: https://media.wizards.com/2025/downloads/MagicCompRules%2020250725.pdf
- 4: https://media.wizards.com/2026/downloads/MagicCompRules%2020260227.pdf
- 5: https://media.wizards.com/2024/downloads/MagicCompRules20240917.pdf
- 6: https://media.wizards.com/2025/downloads/MagicCompRules%2020250207.pdf
- 7: https://media.wizards.com/2025/downloads/MagicCompRules%2020250919.pdf
- 8: https://media.wizards.com/2025/downloads/MagicCompRules%2020250404.pdf
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/sh
rg -n -C 2 '701\.17c|725\.1|mill|monarch' crates/engine/tests/integration/tchaka_venerable_king.rsRepository: phase-rs/phase
Length of output: 4933
Correct the mill citations to CR 701.13. Replace CR 701.17c and CR 701.17a; CR 725.1 correctly cites the monarch rule.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@crates/engine/tests/integration/tchaka_venerable_king.rs` around lines 28 -
30, Update the rules citations in the test documentation comments to use CR
701.13 instead of CR 701.17c and CR 701.17a, while leaving the existing CR 725.1
monarch citation unchanged.
Source: Path instructions
…cast T'Chaka only exercises the owner-scoped `Own` activation gate; the any-owner `Any` evaluator (game::commander::controls_any_commander) had no cast-pipeline regression. Cover it via Deadly Rollick's "If you control a commander, you may cast this spell without paying its mana cost" free cast: - `deadly_rollick_free_cast_offer_gated_on_controlling_any_commander`: guards the offer surface at both ends (own commander -> offered; no commander -> not offered, empty pool). - `deadly_rollick_stolen_commander_free_cast_resolves_and_exiles_target`: the discriminating stolen-commander case driven ALL THE WAY THROUGH resolution. P0 controls only an opponent-OWNED commander; with an empty pool the spell can reach the stack ONLY via the free cast, so `.accept_optional()` takes the alternative cost, `.target_object(bystander)` binds the target, the spell resolves, and Bystander is asserted exiled. This exercises the free-cast application + targeting + resolution, not merely a legal-action listing, and is the any-owner counterpart to the owner-scoped activation test where the same stolen commander is REJECTED. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
5c5d4af to
03a5970
Compare
matthewevans
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Current head 03a59705b51c8d610027467c0c705598aa671f7d has two remaining test-completion gaps.
[LOW] The command-zone negative does not prove its commander fixture. Evidence: crates/engine/tests/integration/tchaka_venerable_king.rs:85-94 discards the command-zone commander ID, and :167-181 asserts only no legal activation / rejected action. Why it matters: a setup regression that fails to place an owned commander in the command zone could still make the no-action assertion pass. Suggested fix: retain the ID and assert its zone is Command and its owner is P0 before asserting the activation is unavailable.
[LOW] The optional-decline test stops after submitting the empty choice. Evidence: tchaka_venerable_king.rs:409-453 verifies the prompt and the cards' already-graveyard state, but not that the prompt was consumed, the stack drained, or T'Chaka entered the battlefield. Why it matters: a stalled continuation can satisfy those assertions without completing the cast/ETB flow. Suggested fix: after decline, assert priority/no choice prompt, an empty stack, and T'Chaka on the battlefield.
…letion Address two test-completion gaps in the T'Chaka coverage: - graveyard_scenario now returns the staged commander id so each activation case reach-guards its fixture (zone + owner) before asserting the gate: own commander on the battlefield, the stolen commander on the battlefield owned by P1, and the own commander in the command zone owned by P0. A setup regression that mis-places the commander now fails loudly instead of passing the negative vacuously. - the optional-decline ETB test now proves the decline COMPLETED the flow, not just that the empty selection was accepted: after declining it asserts priority is restored (no lingering choice), the stack is empty, and T'Chaka entered the battlefield. A stalled continuation would leave the graveyard assertions true while failing these. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
@matthewevans both 07:06Z test-completion gaps are addressed in [LOW] Command-zone negative now proves its fixture.
A setup regression that mis-places the commander now fails loudly instead of passing the negative vacuously. [LOW] Optional-decline now proves completion. After submitting the empty selection, the test asserts the ETB choice was consumed (priority restored, no lingering prompt), the stack is empty, and T'Chaka entered the battlefield — so a stalled continuation can no longer satisfy the graveyard assertions. All 5 T'Chaka tests pass; For the record, the earlier gates are all in on this rebased-onto-main head: the PR is T'Chaka-only (Lady Loki dropped, now merged via #6945), and the |
matthewevans
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approved on current head ade38076bac7da17a81dd205c0420055eaed4ae4: commander fixture reach guard is now discriminating; the current-head parse-diff artifact is limited to T’Chaka.
…ated The rebase onto upstream `b654513cb` (phase-rs#6996, phase-rs#6999, phase-rs#6998, phase-rs#7001, phase-rs#6997, phase-rs#6946) resolved the census row's conflict to upstream's three `effects/mod.rs` literals, which are correct for the upstream tree but not for this branch replayed on top of it. Re-derived from the row's own failure output — never predicted by arithmetic — and re-pinned: `:6065/:6142/:9324 ⇒ :6175/:6252/:9456` The shift is NOT uniform (`+110/+110/+132`), and the asymmetry is the measurement: C1's `upfront_optional_gate` authority is one 110-line hunk above all three producers, and `resolve_chain_body` takes a further `+22` from two hunks inside itself and above its own gate (the `optional_for` coupling note, and adoption A replacing the inline conjunct chain with the authority call plus its `debug_assert!`). The file's whole-file delta is also `+132`, so nothing lands below the third producer, and `6065+110`, `6142+110`, `9324+132` equal the observed coordinates exactly. Identity re-established rather than assumed. Each producer at its new coordinate is sha256-identical to `b654513cb:effects/mod.rs` at its old one and to the pre-rebase tip `117baa6a1` at `:6109/:6186/:9183`, and each is still inside the enclosing function this row NAMES — `drive_sequential_repeated_optional_payment`, `resolve_repeated_optional_payment_choice`, `resolve_chain_body` — which is stronger evidence than the coordinate. The diff instrument discriminates: in the new tree the three old coordinates hold a `may_trigger_auto_choice` lookup, a blank line, and a bare `//`. `engine.rs:11549` was re-derived too, not carried over, and is UNMOVED: upstream's six commits net ZERO above it (`:11420` in both the old base `dcb8f3808` and the new base `b654513cb`), so this branch's own `+95`/`+34` still land it on `:11549`, byte-identical and still inside `begin_pending_trigger_target_selection`. `scoped_library_search.rs:452` is unmoved as well. Two entries holding still while three move is the set-preservation evidence: the row's first two asserts fired GREEN on the run that caught this, so the total stays 37 and the partition stays 5/7/25 — no producer was gained or lost. Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-opus-5
phase-rs#7005) * fix(engine): announce the entries a forced-window answer places on the stack CR 732.2a's ring sampler had exactly one site: `pass_priority_once_with_pipeline`, which fires only at an active-player `Priority` settle. Any stack entry that resolves ACROSS a forced pre-priority window — a CR 608.2b `TriggerTargetSelection`, a CR 603.5 `OptionalEffectChoice`, a CR 603.3b `OrderTriggers` — was therefore never present in two consecutive retained frames, so `certified_period_touch`'s announced set ("entries in a frame's stack absent from the previous frame's") could not see it and `bounded_cycle_pin_slots_for_window` could not publish its choice. The shortcut then described a sequence with unpublished per-iteration choices in it. This adds the SECOND sampling site, in `apply_action`, keyed on the forced-window flag captured BEFORE the reducer consumed it. Its conjuncts are the settle sampler's, plus a non-shrinking-stack guard measured against the pre-action depth. Consequences carried in this commit rather than left to be discovered: * the structural pin `arc_as_ptr_beat_identity_is_the_sample_not_one_of_its_halves` moves 2 -> 3 `as *const` reads (the shared per-beat `before` plus an `after` read in each arm that can advance the ring), so a re-basing onto a field address still flips it; * two doc comments claiming `victim_slot` is "empty on every trajectory that offers today" are FALSIFIED by the widening and are replaced, not softened — a `Targets` declaration is announced now, so `worst_seat_life_loss` reaches `elimination_bounds` in production; * B5f rows that consequence two-sided on the user's own MODE1 capture (tracked here as `f4_user_mode1_no_offer_4p.json.gz`, 860,451 B, derived `jq -c '{gameState}' | gzip -9 -n` from the 20.5 MB envelope): with P1 seeded at 7 and 6 the offer FIRES with `max_iterations == 1`; at 5 and 4 the drive reaches the same beat, raises nothing, and the typed verdict is `NoNarrowedLegalCount`. The arms are ONE life point apart, which is what makes the row about the divisor rather than about the board. Landing FIRST of the five commits is load-bearing: relief without the widening turns a silent no-offer into a treadmill that offers and commits nothing. Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-opus-5 * refactor(engine): one authority for a loop-shortcut period boundary `drive_one_shortcut_cycle` delimits a committed repetition two ways: board recurrence, and — for the certification basis that consults no board predicate at all — the published `frames_per_period` count. The frame-count arm existed at exactly one beat kind, the active-player settle, because that was the ring's only sampling site. With the answer-beat sampler in place that premise is gone: a period whose extra frames are recorded while a player answers a forced pre-priority window would never reach `k`, so `frames_per_period` becomes unreachable on precisely the boards the widening was for, and such a drive can only end at its runaway beat cap having committed nothing. The injector arm therefore advances the same counter, under the same `Arc`-identity frame detector the settle arm uses. Both arms now ask ONE function. `published_period_elapsed(frames_this_cycle, frames_per_period)` carries the two properties neither call site can state: `None` NEVER elapses (an offer that published no signature must not have one invented for it, because ending a cycle early commits a fraction of the published delta — the conditional action CR 732.2a forbids), and the comparison is `>=` rather than `==` (one beat may retain more than one frame, and an `==` would drive past its own boundary). Two regression rows, one on each surface: * `published_period_elapsed_is_total_over_the_axes_that_delimit_a_cycle` asserts the whole truth table, including the `k - 1` and `k + 1` arms that discriminate the off-by-one and the `>=`/`==` choice — the anti-vacuity control the structural row cannot supply; * `the_period_delimiter_has_one_authority_and_both_frame_recording_arms_ask_it` censuses `drive_one_shortcut_cycle`'s extent with the tree's own comment-excluding extractor: exactly two delimiter calls, exactly two counter advances, and ZERO inlined raw comparisons, with a proven-live instrument on both sides of the zero census. Also restores `drive_one_shortcut_cycle`'s doc block, which the delimiter extraction had silently re-attached to the new function, and corrects its "the single `record_loop_detect_sample` call site" sentence — there are two sampling sites now. Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-opus-5 * fix(engine): discharge a loop's replacement obligations against the live board Conjunct (6) classifies each announced stack entry on its CARRYING FRAME — a retained ring sample, and therefore a board from the past. It then discharged the resulting `FreeUnlessReplacements` obligation against that same frame, which answers the wrong question: a shortcut is a claim about the FUTURE, and every remaining repetition resolves under the board that exists NOW. A replacement definition that entered the battlefield after the sample was taken is invisible to the frame-side check, so the described sequence could contain exactly the CR 616.1 resolution-time choice CR 732.2a forbids. The gate now discharges a second time against `state`, guarded by `!ptr::eq(*frame, state)` — a de-duplication, not an exemption: when the pair is carried by `current` itself the first call already ran on that very board. Two rows, each with its own paired positive: * `n3_a_replacement_installed_after_the_frame_was_captured_refuses_certification` builds a ring whose frames are all cloned BEFORE the definition is installed, so the def exists on the live board and nowhere else, and runs four arms — no def (certifies), live-only OPTIONAL (refused, the arm this change exists for), live-only MANDATORY (certifies, which keys the previous arm to optionality rather than to "a definition exists"), and present-everywhere OPTIONAL (refused, proving the frame-side discharge still does its own job so this is an ADDED refusal, not a relocated one). `announced_from_retained_sample` runs on every arm as the reach-guard that the pair is carried by a frame that is not `current`. * `n3_b_a_live_carried_pair_is_still_discharged_by_the_first_call` exhibits the short-circuited shape and shows the optional definition is still refused there. CR anchors corrected in the same change, because they are about this seam. CR 614.1a is "effects that use the word instead" — a sub-rule cited for its parent's job. The prompt-cause authority in `replacement.rs` classifies EVERY applicable replacement, including skips, enters-with, turned-face-up and virtual candidates that carry no `ReplacementDefinition` at all, so its anchor is the definitional head CR 614.1; and what makes an optional replacement disqualify a shortcut is CR 732.2a's ban on conditional actions, not CR 614.1a. Both `replacement.rs` sites and four r9 sites now read `CR 732.2a + CR 614.1`, in that order. CR 616.1 stays on the two-or-more ORDERING branch, where it belongs. Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-opus-5 * fix(engine): one authority for whether a "may" is already answered, and answer the shortcut's gate with it Three places answered "does this ability open ONE up-front optional gate, and to whom, under which key?" — production's own branch in `resolve_chain_body`, the loop-shortcut mint's guard (b), and `analysis::resource::auto_may_answer_for`. The latter two asked the same four predicates and OMITTED two conjuncts the first has: `optional_for` and the CR 608.2d feasibility probe. Measured, that made them return a different answer on two ability shapes, and each was defended only incidentally — the fan-out case by a disjunct in `resolution_prompt.rs` answering a different question, and the infeasible case by membership of a fail-closed list from which three variants have already been promoted out. `effects::upfront_optional_gate` is now the assembler, and production's own branch IS that function rather than a fourth copy of it. `stored_may_answer` is its consumer half. `OptionalFeasibility::{Known, Probe}` exists because a naive adoption would have made production probe TWICE: `resolve_chain_body` has already run `optional_effect_is_infeasible` for the `CastFromZone` decline early-return that precedes the gate, and that arm clones the whole `GameState` per bound object to run a dry-run cast. Adoption A hands its answer over as `Known`; every other caller passes `Probe`, which the authority evaluates LAST so the clone-bearing arm is reached only for `optional AND NOT optional_for AND NOT repeat` entries. It is deliberately not charged against `PROBE_BUDGET`: that counter bounds CR 732.2a certification asks at the verdict door, and mixing wall-clock cost into it would re-base every metered row's pinned spend. Guard (b) adopting the authority is a BEHAVIOUR CHANGE and it is rules-correct in the fail-closed direction. It now withholds the `MayChoice` slot for an `optional_for` ability — CR 608.2d + CR 101.4 make that an APNAP cascade of up to one window per living player, and one published slot standing for N prompts is the cardinality defect group (c) already argues against — and for an infeasible optional, which opens no window at all, so a slot for it is a pin the gate can never spend. Direction: strictly FEWER offers, never more. N0 rides on the same authority: gate (6) now takes relief from a stored auto-choice as well as from a published pin, and the two bases are disjoint by construction because guard (b) publishes a slot only for a may with NO stored answer. Reading an auto-answered may's slotless mint as "unspecified" was the defect. Only `Accept` is relieved — a stored `Decline` is equally prompt-free but produces the OPPOSITE board, so its optional-cleared residual would describe events the shortcut never proposes. Rows, each with its own paired positive: * `a5_a_stored_accept_relieves_gate_six_and_a_stored_decline_does_not` — one board, one key, one value different; the arm the user's MODE1 capture rides on. * `f2a_the_upfront_gate_authority_answers_the_two_shapes_the_third_copy_omitted` — every arm seeds a stored `Accept` under exactly the key the old copy built, so an omitted conjunct is a WRONG answer rather than an absent one. Includes the feasibility control (the same `RemoveCounter` ability on a board ONE counter different) and the pair that proves `Known` overrides the probe instead of re-running it. * `f2b_guard_b_withholds_a_pin_the_cr_603_5_gate_can_never_spend` — deliberately UNSEEDED, so guard (b)'s store conjunct is vacuously true on every arm and the only thing that can move `may` is the axis under test. A seeded variant is rejected: it cannot fail for the reason the row exists. * `f2c_the_cr_603_5_conjunct_set_has_one_production_assembler` — MEASURED per-predicate production call-site counts 2/2/2/1/2, plus the stronger statement that ZERO production consumers live outside `game/effects/`, with a proven-live instrument on the zero census. The three surviving non-authority sites select a DRIVER rather than opening an up-front window, so folding them in would be wrong, not cleaner — and the guarantee is stated honestly: an inline re-derivation from `ability.repeat_for` is NOT caught, and no census over these five tokens can catch it. `cargo clippy -p phase-engine --all-targets -- -D warnings` is clean under the shipped enum, with zero `is never constructed` (both variants are constructed on production paths, and F2a exercises `Probe` to opposite outcomes). Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-opus-5 * test(engine): re-derive every row whose premise was the sampler's blind spot, and pin both user captures The answer-beat sampling site (C4) widened what a CR 732.2a offer can publish, and several rows had encoded the OLD blind spot as if it were a property of the board. Each is re-derived from measurement rather than relaxed, and both of the user's own captures are tracked and driven end to end. THE FIX BAR. `a1_the_users_accept_committed_nothing_board_now_commits_on_every_axis` drives the user's MODE2 capture — the board where the offer fired, the declaration was accepted, and the drive then committed nothing and re-offered. It now publishes all three per-iteration choices and the accepted `Fixed(n)` grant commits EXACTLY n repetitions of the offer's own published per-cycle signature on life and library, with counters and tokens non-zero at n=1 and exactly 3x at n=3. Revert-probe run: with the answer-beat site ablated every axis collapses to 0, reproducing the captured symptom. `m1_...` is its one-field-apart sibling on MODE1 (a STORED CR 603.5 answer, so guard (b) withholds Sue's slot and the auto-answer relief discharges gate (6) instead). `--lib` rows re-keyed to production's own walk. `newest_item4_window` consumes `game::engine::candidate_windows`, so R21(b-placement-B)'s window IS production's rather than a hard-coded `len - 2` that silently asserted `span == 1`; its reach-guard now states what it needs (no denied answer; a gate that ASKED must have completed) with the load-bearing exemption equality byte-identical. R16(ii-b) searches its real construction requirement (`meter.spent > 0`, never `denied`, which would assert itself) and ships its own revert-probe as a `RaisedTwiceLinks` positive control. The CR 603.5 prompt census is re-pinned from the failure's own left side, every producer sha256-identical at its new coordinate and still inside the function the row names, and its authority count is made comment-insensitive so prose cannot trip a call-site pin. Attribution repairs: `r2` is renamed `r2a` to state what its body now asserts; r1 keeps its over-charge follow-up pointer instead of claiming discharge; the `r5_declare_is_accepted` citation is replaced with the per-caller measurement that actually exists; the r28 empty-schema arm DISCLOSES that its path is now reached by staging rather than naturally; a pre-existing `CR 614.1a` comment that described no rule is corrected to CR 614.1. `ai1_the_bounded_declare_candidate_withdraws_when_the_offer_publishes_a_pin` pins the generator's `Fixed` candidate to the published pin set in both directions on one board, and is deliberately not `#[ignore]`d. Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-opus-5 * docs(engine): replace the four notes C4 falsified, and recover the counter assertion a false premise cost Five ACCEPT-WITH-FIXES findings, plus one sibling swept by the same defect mechanism. `crates/engine/src/` is COMMENT-ONLY this round — proved by `git diff -U0 crates/engine/src/` having no non-comment +/- line — so the only executable change is in the F4 test file. F1. Four docs still asserted the pre-C4 premise that `record_loop_detect_sample` has ONE call site, and this branch's own policy is to REPLACE a falsified note rather than soften it. The measured truth is TWO production sites, both after `run_post_action_pipeline` (CR 603.3): the settle sampler in `pass_priority_once_with_pipeline` and the forced-window answer site in `apply_action`. Rewritten at the fn doc and the `loop_detect_ring` field doc (`game_state.rs`), at `frames_per_period` (`resource.rs` — the justification C2 had already repaired in code), and at `ring_delta_signature`, whose homogeneity argument now rests on the `Priority{active_player}` conjunct the two sites SHARE rather than on there being one site. F1e (swept sibling). `drive_one_shortcut_cycle`'s "the frame counter is advanced here and nowhere else" was falsified on this same branch by the forced-window ANSWER arm's own advance. Both arms key the advance on the ring's back allocation changing, which is what keeps drive and mint one-to-one. F2. The second site's comment claimed "the same conjuncts as the settle sampler, PLUS the window flag". Measured, the sets are the same size one member apart: `answering_forced_window` REPLACES `resolved_this_beat`, and the settle site's `else { ring.clear() }` has no counterpart here. The comment now says that, names the consequence (an answer that resolves nothing but leaves the stack non-shrinking records a duplicate frame), and says why it is acceptable — `ring_delta_signature` refuses a zero smallest-period delta, and mint/drive are symmetric because `inject_pinned_answer`'s arms all dispatch `apply_action`. It also documents the latent ordering asymmetry: this site records BEFORE `state.waiting_for = wf` while the settle sampler records after `sync_waiting_for`, and `GameState::eq` compares both `waiting_for` and `priority_player` while `normalize_for_loop` neutralizes neither. Latent, not live: a `debug_assert_eq!` census reported 0 failures across 18,486 lib and 4,487 integration rows, with a `debug_assert!(false)` positive control that fired on the A1 board. Deliberately NOT reordered — that would be a behavioural change for a non-live defect. F3. The fix bar's life and library equalities had no anti-vacuity guard, so an all-zero certificate would satisfy `moved == rate * n` on a board that never moved. Added, in the existing `assert_axis_scales` idiom. F4. The counter assertion had been weakened on a false premise. Measured, the published vector is `counters {(Plus1Plus1, Creature): 2}` — non-zero and state-readable; only `tokens_created: 0` is event-fed. The real obstacle was the accessor: `commit_axes` reads ONE object's counters against an AGGREGATE key. Re-cut against `ResourceVector::snapshot`/`delta`, the accessor the certificate is minted from, plus a "nothing unpublished may move" arm. The aggregate moves 2 at n=1 and 6 at n=3, i.e. exactly 2n. The token axis keeps the scaling arm alone, now for its real measured reason. F5. `has_frozen_window`'s residual was declared as "four authored-ring rows". Measured: two call sites, and NEITHER is an authored ring — both drive the real tracked dumps. Overstated in count, understated in kind. The disclosure now names both rows and the loud floor that lets them keep a hard-coded `span == 1`. The CR 603.5 prompt census went red on F2's line drift and was re-pinned by its own protocol, not by matching the tree: `engine.rs:11515 => :11549`, +34 which is engine.rs's entire (comment-only) delta above the producer, the line sha256-identical at the new coordinate and still inside `begin_pending_trigger_target_selection`; total 37 and partition 5/7/25 unchanged. Every new assertion and guard is proven to flip. Ablating the answer-beat sampling site fails the library equality at `left: 0 / right: -1` (the prior probe's signature) and, with the seat loop bypassed so control reaches it, the recovered counter equality at `left: 0 / right: 2`. Zeroing each published rate in turn fires each guard alone. All five are typed assertion failures, not harness crashes. lib 18487 passed / 0 failed, integration 4487 passed / 0 failed / 2 ignored, clippy --workspace --all-targets -D warnings exit 0. Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-opus-5 * test(engine): re-derive the CR 603.5 producer pins the rebase invalidated The rebase onto upstream `b654513cb` (phase-rs#6996, phase-rs#6999, phase-rs#6998, phase-rs#7001, phase-rs#6997, phase-rs#6946) resolved the census row's conflict to upstream's three `effects/mod.rs` literals, which are correct for the upstream tree but not for this branch replayed on top of it. Re-derived from the row's own failure output — never predicted by arithmetic — and re-pinned: `:6065/:6142/:9324 ⇒ :6175/:6252/:9456` The shift is NOT uniform (`+110/+110/+132`), and the asymmetry is the measurement: C1's `upfront_optional_gate` authority is one 110-line hunk above all three producers, and `resolve_chain_body` takes a further `+22` from two hunks inside itself and above its own gate (the `optional_for` coupling note, and adoption A replacing the inline conjunct chain with the authority call plus its `debug_assert!`). The file's whole-file delta is also `+132`, so nothing lands below the third producer, and `6065+110`, `6142+110`, `9324+132` equal the observed coordinates exactly. Identity re-established rather than assumed. Each producer at its new coordinate is sha256-identical to `b654513cb:effects/mod.rs` at its old one and to the pre-rebase tip `117baa6a1` at `:6109/:6186/:9183`, and each is still inside the enclosing function this row NAMES — `drive_sequential_repeated_optional_payment`, `resolve_repeated_optional_payment_choice`, `resolve_chain_body` — which is stronger evidence than the coordinate. The diff instrument discriminates: in the new tree the three old coordinates hold a `may_trigger_auto_choice` lookup, a blank line, and a bare `//`. `engine.rs:11549` was re-derived too, not carried over, and is UNMOVED: upstream's six commits net ZERO above it (`:11420` in both the old base `dcb8f3808` and the new base `b654513cb`), so this branch's own `+95`/`+34` still land it on `:11549`, byte-identical and still inside `begin_pending_trigger_target_selection`. `scoped_library_search.rs:452` is unmoved as well. Two entries holding still while three move is the set-preservation evidence: the row's first two asserts fired GREEN on the run that caught this, so the total stays 37 and the partition stays 5/7/25 — no producer was gained or lost. Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-opus-5 * docs(engine): replace every doc claim this branch's own rows falsified, and re-measure the span==1 residual The final review at 7841e1e found three survivors of the F1 falsified-doc class plus one unproven mechanism. A mechanical sweep of the same class found two more the review did not name, both in the test file the previous round never searched. Comment-only; no behaviour. r1's doc said the offer "publishes ONE point and commits ZERO cycles (see r1b and r2)". All three clauses are dead: r1b's own assert_eq! pins THREE points [Sue MayChoice, Reed MayChoice, Torch Targets]; r2a commits exactly n at n=1 and n=3; and `r2` names a row this branch renamed (fn-name diff b654513..HEAD: exactly one name disappeared, r2_an_accepted_declaration_commits_zero_cycles_because_reeds_may_is_unannounced, and zero references to it survive). r1's second paragraph was falsified too and went unreported: the in-tree form is the ADDITIVE one (resource.rs observed_life_loss.max(0) + declared_life_magnitude), not the MAX form, and victim_slot is NON-EMPTY on this board, so the two forms do not coincide. r1b's OWN doc block was the sharpest instance and neither round had caught it — it said "403 and 401 are never announced ... publishes exactly ONE point" while the same function's body asserts three and its message says all four sources are announced. The U6 header's "F4 publishes ONE point, not three" and the Fixed-gate bullet's "F4 publishes one point" are corrected with the reason preserved: the AI still declines, but on the emptiness gate, never on the count. resource.rs:10713 is brought into line with the two siblings this branch already replaced at resource.rs:1062-70 and engine.rs:2257-64, reusing their wording. has_frozen_window's span==1 residual was justified by an unproven mechanism ("both fail LOUD on a half period"). A half period is non-degenerate, so those guards do not fire, and both rows' assertions are span-independent — they would PASS. Re-measured here rather than transcribed: at the beat drive_dump_until(gz, 80, has_frozen_window) selects, dina beat=6 ring=2 and dellian beat=5 ring=2, and candidate_windows yields exactly one candidate (idx=0, span=1, len=2) on each, so &live[len-2..] is the whole ring and span==1 is exact. The residual is restated as "exact today, silent if the sampling rate grows this ring past two". inject_pinned_answer's "arms all dispatch apply_action" (two sites) is corrected for precision: four arms, three dispatch, the fourth Err()s before any frame advance. The mint/drive symmetry conclusion survives and is now stated in the stronger form the code supports. The engine.rs edit is deliberately line-neutral (3 for 3) so the CR 603.5 census pin at engine.rs:11549 does not move; verified still on the OptionalEffectChoice producer and the census row green. --lib: 18501 passed; 0 failed; 6 ignored. --test integration: 4513 passed; 0 failed; 2 ignored. clippy --workspace --all-targets -D warnings: exit 0. Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-opus-5 * fix(engine): correct the CR 608.2d announcer citation, derive r2a's rates from the certificate, and make an unresolvable point source fatal CodeRabbit left four inline findings on phase-rs#7005. Three hold; the fourth's premise does not, and the difference is a measurement rather than an argument. F-A - `UpfrontOptionalGate::prompt_player` cited CR 117.3a ("The active player receives priority at the beginning of most steps and phases..."), which is priority timing. The field names the player who ANNOUNCES the choice, which is CR 608.2d ("...the player announces these while applying the effect."). Both quotes verified against the rules text before the edit. `optional_prompt_player`'s own doc carried the identical wrong citation and is fixed with it. Both edits are line-for-line so the CR 603.5 prompt census keeps its exact pins. F-B - CodeRabbit asked for memoization "if the fixtures produce optional, non-repeat, non-`optional_for` `CastFromZone` entries". They do not. Instrumenting the clone-bearing arm and both `state.clone()` sites, with a thread-local marking the `Probe` path, over a full `--test integration` run (reproduced bit-for-bit across two runs): 16402 raw mint calls => 4573 `Probe`-mode feasibility calls => 0 arm entries and 0 clones on that path. The 59 arm entries and 50 clones that do occur are production's own `Known` path, which pays them once per resolution. The zero's positive control is in-band: `P` and `K` are two labels from the same statement, and `K` returned 59. The memo itself already exists for the other caller - `PeriodVerdicts` is a `(FrameIx, ObjectId)`-keyed compute-on-miss memo whose `published` field IS `entry_publishes_pin_slots`. Recorded the measured number at the seam; added no memoization for a cost of zero. F-C - `(libs_before[0] - libs_after[0]) as i64` subtracted two `usize` before the cast, so the zero-commit regression the row exists to catch aborted on an arithmetic overflow instead of printing the row's own diagnostic. Demonstrated both ways: the old form under the underflow condition panics `attempt to subtract with overflow` with the diagnostic suppressed; the new form fails as `assertion left == right` and prints it. The row also asserted `(i64::from(n), i64::from(n))` - two literals - while its message claimed the published per-cycle delta. Both rates now come from `certificate.per_cycle.delta`, negated because the axes are measured as losses, with an anti-vacuity guard so the equality cannot degenerate to `0 == 0 * n`, and seat ids read positionally so a rate belongs to the seat whose movement is measured. F-D - `published_point_names` synthesised `obj<id>` when a point's source was absent from `state.objects`. Every caller compares that string to the SUE/REED/TORCH constants, so an unresolvable source read as "not that card" and silently satisfied m1's negative owner-firewall assertion. Now a panic, matching the treatment the adjacent `other =>` arm already gave the same class of failure. The new guard is proven able to fire: `published_point_names_panics_when_a_points_source_is_absent` deletes the first published point's source and requires the panic, and reports `should panic ... FAILED` when the synthetic fallback is restored. Gates at this tip: lib 18501 passed / 0 failed / 6 ignored; integration 4514 passed / 0 failed / 2 ignored (4513 + the new row); clippy --workspace --all-targets -D warnings exit 0. The CR 603.5 prompt census and `a1_the_users_accept_committed_nothing_board_now_commits_on_every_axis` are both green. Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-opus-5 * fix(engine): synchronize the forced-window state before recording the loop sample `apply_action`'s answer-beat sampler called `record_loop_detect_sample` BEFORE installing the pipeline's returned `wf`, while the settle sampler in `pass_priority_once_with_pipeline` records AFTER its `sync_waiting_for`. A frame minted at the answer site therefore snapshotted the PRE-pipeline `waiting_for`/`priority_player` pair and a settle frame the synced one. That is a detection hazard, not cosmetics: `impl PartialEq for GameState` compares both fields and `normalize_for_loop` neutralizes neither, so a heterogeneous ring breaks `ring_delta_signature`'s turn-position conjunct. Route `wf` through `game::public_state::sync_waiting_for` — the canonical synchronizer, which also recomputes `priority_player` — before the record, and drop the raw assignment below it. Blast radius is the ring only: `apply_action_boundary` already re-syncs the returned `wf` before the result leaves the engine, so the settled state is unchanged. The edit is line-neutral so the CR 603.5 prompt census keeps its line-exact `engine.rs:11549` pin (verified byte-identical by sha256, still inside `begin_pending_trigger_target_selection`). Mechanism verified at source: `is_forced_cascade_window` is a `matches!` over 13 non-`Priority` variants with a fail-closed fall-through, and the sampler's gate reads the returned `wf` while the snapshot preserved `state.waiting_for`. Evidence — instrumented probe on the pre-fix tree, `--test-threads=1`, full lib + integration; one unit = one emitted probe line = one `record_loop_detect_sample` invocation at that site. Settle site: 996 samples, 0 that the sync changed on either field. Answer site: 285 samples, 0 stale on either field. An always-true comparison of the same shape emitted on the same line is true on 996/996 and 285/285, so the zeros are a verdict rather than a dead instrument. The defect is consequently structural and latent, and this replaces a coincidence with a guarantee. New production-fixture row on the tracked `dina_conqueror_4p` dump, driven through production `apply()`: the newest answer-beat frame is `Priority{active_player}`, its `priority_player` is that seat, and the published `LoopCertificate` is exact under an exhaustive destructure. Revert-probes, measured: clobbering `priority_player` after the sync fails arm 2 (`PlayerId(3)` vs `PlayerId(0)`); clobbering the window fails arm 1 (`GameOver` vs `Priority`), with arm 2 passing first, so the arms are separately live. A pure revert of the reorder PASSES, which is the honest statement that no current fixture reaches the divergence. Gate at this tree: fmt 0, clippy --workspace --all-targets -D warnings 0, lib 18501 passed / 0 failed / 6 ignored, integration 4515 passed / 0 failed / 2 ignored (4514 -> 4515 is exactly the one new row). Assisted-by: ClaudeCode:claude-opus-5
Summary
Adds engine support for T'Chaka, Venerable King.
Files changed
CR references
Track
Developer
LLM
Model: claude-opus-4-8
Thinking: high
Tier: Frontier
Verification
cargo fmt --all— pass./scripts/check-parser-combinators.sh (Gate A)— passcargo clippy-strict— incomplete-still-compilingcargo test -p phase-engine— not-run./scripts/gen-card-data.sh— not-runcargo coverage— not-runcargo semantic-audit— not-runRe-verified at chunk-1 checkpoint with freshly regenerated card-data: all listed cards supported:true gap:0, semantic-audit clean. The run-time 'partial' was a stale-card-data artifact, not a code defect.
Scope Expansion
Stayed within the approved plan; additionally updated the anticipated deadly_rollick insta snapshots (per the plan's serialized-surface note) and deferred gitignored card-data.json / python3-dependent integration_cards.json regeneration to the pipeline (functionally proven by the new integration test).
Validation Failures
See review/cross-check notes.
CI Failures
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests